Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Correctional_Services_Corp._v._Malesko an entity of type: Thing
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the Court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents should not be extended to allow recovery against a private corporation operating a halfway house under contract with the Bureau of Prisons.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Correctional Services Corp. v. Malesko
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
xsd:integer
11025215
xsd:integer
895896534
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
61
xsd:integer
534
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-01
xsd:integer
2001
rdf:langString
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko,
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-27
xsd:integer
2001
rdf:langString
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
rdf:langString
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Correctional Services Corporation v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61 (2001), was a case decided by the United States Supreme Court, in which the Court found that implied damages actions first recognized in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents should not be extended to allow recovery against a private corporation operating a halfway house under contract with the Bureau of Prisons. A Bivens action is a civil rights violation suit against the government. The Supreme Court limited this court-invented private right of action to exclude corporate defendants like Correctional Services Corporation. Plaintiff's actions against the individual employees were barred by the statute of limitations because the names of the John Doe defendant prison guards (esp. Jorge Urena) were not known to the plaintiff.
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2571