Corbett v Corbett

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Corbett_v_Corbett an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) is a 1970 family law divorce case heard between November and December 1969 by the High Court of England and Wales in which Arthur Corbett sought annulment of his marriage to April Ashley. Corbett (the husband) had known at the time of the wedding that Ashley (the wife) had been registered male at birth and had undertaken sex-reassignment surgery. However, after the relationship had broken down Corbett sought to end the marriage, his legal ground for doing so being that the wedding had been invalid as Ashley was of the male sex. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Corbett v Corbett
rdf:langString Corbett v. Corbett
xsd:integer 2642935
xsd:integer 1111221700
rdf:langString [1971] P. 83, [1970] 2 All E.R. 33
rdf:langString Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division of the High Court of Justice
rdf:langString Arthur Cameron Corbett v. April Corbett
rdf:langString yes
rdf:langString Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) is a 1970 family law divorce case heard between November and December 1969 by the High Court of England and Wales in which Arthur Corbett sought annulment of his marriage to April Ashley. Corbett (the husband) had known at the time of the wedding that Ashley (the wife) had been registered male at birth and had undertaken sex-reassignment surgery. However, after the relationship had broken down Corbett sought to end the marriage, his legal ground for doing so being that the wedding had been invalid as Ashley was of the male sex. The court held that, for the purposes of marriage, sex was to be legally defined by three factors present at birth that the judge referred to as 'biological' – namely chromosomal, gonadal and genital. Any surgery or medical intervention was to be ignored, as were any psychological factors (which were in this case identified with Ashley's 'transsexualism'). Holding that Ashley had been born and continued to be a biological male – a fact that could not be changed by surgery – the judge held that the marriage (which had to be between man and woman) should be annulled. Although the judgment was restricted to a consideration of legal sex specifically within marriage, its reasoning was later applied more widely within England and Wales.
xsd:date 1970-02-02
rdf:langString Ormrod
xsd:integer 1
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 13900

data from the linked data cloud