Comparative negligence
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Comparative_negligence an entity of type: Agent
Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury. When the defense is asserted, the factfinder, usually a jury, must decide the degree to which the plaintiff's negligence and the combined negligence of all other relevant actors all contributed to cause the plaintiff's damages. It is a modification of the doctrine of contributory negligence that disallows any recovery by a plaintiff whose negligence contributed even minimally to causing the damages.
rdf:langString
상대적 과실(comparative negligence)은 영미법 불법행위에서 피고가 원고에 대해 할 수 있는 항변이다. 피고가 받을 수 있는 보상 규모를 일부 감면할 수 있는 근거가 되며 재판에서 배심원들이 사실을 바탕으로 원고가 얼마만큼의 상대적 과실이 있는지 피고의 과실과 비교하여 판단하게 된다.
rdf:langString
比較過失（英語：comparative negligence）、或指在美國之外所稱的非絕對助成過失，是一種部分性的法律辯護、即根據原告自己的疏忽所導致的損害程度，減少了原告基於過失索賠所能獲得的賠償金額；反之即減少被告所應承擔的賠償份額。辯護主張時，通常是陪審團的事件調查人員必須決定原告的過失程度、以及所有其他相關行為人他們所造成原告損害的共同過失。比較過失是對助成過失原則的一種修改，如果都是原告的疏忽造所成的甚至是最低限度的損失、即不允許原告的任何追償。
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Comparative negligence
rdf:langString
상대적 과실
rdf:langString
比較過失
xsd:integer
2017783
xsd:integer
1071908384
rdf:langString
Comparative negligence, called non-absolute contributory negligence outside the United States, is a partial legal defense that reduces the amount of damages that a plaintiff can recover in a negligence-based claim, based upon the degree to which the plaintiff's own negligence contributed to cause the injury. When the defense is asserted, the factfinder, usually a jury, must decide the degree to which the plaintiff's negligence and the combined negligence of all other relevant actors all contributed to cause the plaintiff's damages. It is a modification of the doctrine of contributory negligence that disallows any recovery by a plaintiff whose negligence contributed even minimally to causing the damages.
rdf:langString
상대적 과실(comparative negligence)은 영미법 불법행위에서 피고가 원고에 대해 할 수 있는 항변이다. 피고가 받을 수 있는 보상 규모를 일부 감면할 수 있는 근거가 되며 재판에서 배심원들이 사실을 바탕으로 원고가 얼마만큼의 상대적 과실이 있는지 피고의 과실과 비교하여 판단하게 된다.
rdf:langString
比較過失（英語：comparative negligence）、或指在美國之外所稱的非絕對助成過失，是一種部分性的法律辯護、即根據原告自己的疏忽所導致的損害程度，減少了原告基於過失索賠所能獲得的賠償金額；反之即減少被告所應承擔的賠償份額。辯護主張時，通常是陪審團的事件調查人員必須決定原告的過失程度、以及所有其他相關行為人他們所造成原告損害的共同過失。比較過失是對助成過失原則的一種修改，如果都是原告的疏忽造所成的甚至是最低限度的損失、即不允許原告的任何追償。
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
6898