Collateral source rule

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Collateral_source_rule an entity of type: Country

배상금중복회수의 원칙(Collateral source rule)은 1854년 판례에 의해 형성된 미국 커먼로상 원칙으로 피고(가해자)는 신체상해를 입은 원고(피해자)가 보험이나 기타의 방법을 또는 제3자로부터 손해에 대해서 그 전부 또는 일부의 지급을 받고 있어도 피고에 대한 손해배상책임을 부담하는 것을 정한 원칙이다. rdf:langString
The collateral source rule, or collateral source doctrine, is an American case law evidentiary rule that prohibits the admission of evidence that the plaintiff or victim has received compensation from some source other than the damages sought against the defendant. The purpose of the rule is to ensure that the wrongful party pays the full cost of the harm caused, so that future harmful conduct is thereby deterred or, at least, fully included in the defendant's cost of doing business. Subrogation and indemnification principles then commonly provide that the person who paid the initial compensation to the plaintiff or victim has a right to recover any double recovery from the plaintiff or victim. For example, in a personal injury action, evidence that the plaintiff's medical bills were paid rdf:langString
rdf:langString Collateral source rule
rdf:langString 배상금중복회수의 원칙
xsd:integer 3046768
xsd:integer 1093477199
rdf:langString The collateral source rule, or collateral source doctrine, is an American case law evidentiary rule that prohibits the admission of evidence that the plaintiff or victim has received compensation from some source other than the damages sought against the defendant. The purpose of the rule is to ensure that the wrongful party pays the full cost of the harm caused, so that future harmful conduct is thereby deterred or, at least, fully included in the defendant's cost of doing business. Subrogation and indemnification principles then commonly provide that the person who paid the initial compensation to the plaintiff or victim has a right to recover any double recovery from the plaintiff or victim. For example, in a personal injury action, evidence that the plaintiff's medical bills were paid by medical insurance, or by workers' compensation, is not generally admissible and the plaintiff can recover the amount of those bills from the defendant. If the plaintiff then collects the amount of medical bills from the defendant, that amount is then typically paid by the plaintiff to the insurance carrier under principles of subrogation and indemnification. The collateral source doctrine has come under attack by tort reform advocates. They argue that if the plaintiff's injuries and damages have already been compensated, it is unfair and duplicative to allow an award of damages against the tortfeasor. As a result some states have altered or partially abrogated the rule by statute. Proponents of the rule note that without it, the wrongdoer [tortfeasor] gets the benefit of the injured party carrying insurance or obtaining minimal benefits through government programs and obtains a form of subsidy where the wrongdoer does not pay the full cost of their wrongful conduct but instead transfers some of that cost [insurance premiums] to the victims causing insurance rates to be higher. Nevertheless, some courts have held that the rule ought not to provide a safe haven in a contract action for an unfaithful contracting party.
rdf:langString 배상금중복회수의 원칙(Collateral source rule)은 1854년 판례에 의해 형성된 미국 커먼로상 원칙으로 피고(가해자)는 신체상해를 입은 원고(피해자)가 보험이나 기타의 방법을 또는 제3자로부터 손해에 대해서 그 전부 또는 일부의 지급을 받고 있어도 피고에 대한 손해배상책임을 부담하는 것을 정한 원칙이다.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 3539

data from the linked data cloud