Clinton v. City of New York
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Clinton_v._City_of_New_York an entity of type: Thing
Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the line-item veto, as granted in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the power to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of statutes that had been duly passed by the United States Congress. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the six-justice majority that the line-item veto gave the President power over legislation unintended by the Constitution, and was therefore an overstep in their duties.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Clinton v. City of New York
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
William J. Clinton, President of the United States, et al. v. City of New York, et al.
xsd:integer
752054
xsd:integer
1119428735
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
O'Connor, Scalia
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. art. I; 2 U.S.C. § 691 et seq.
<second>
17280.0
rdf:langString
Judgment for plaintiffs, 985 F. Supp. 168
xsd:integer
417
xsd:integer
524
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-27
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
Clinton v. City of New York,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-25
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
William J. Clinton, President of the United States, et al. v. City of New York, et al.
rdf:langString
The Line Item Veto Act is unconstitutional because the Constitution of the United States of America does not authorize the President of the United States of America to amend federal legislation that has passed both the House of Representatives and the Senate in Congress. Line-item vetoes are unlawful.
rdf:langString
Clinton v. City of New York
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Clinton v. City of New York, 524 U.S. 417 (1998), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that the line-item veto, as granted in the Line Item Veto Act of 1996, violated the Presentment Clause of the United States Constitution because it impermissibly gave the President of the United States the power to unilaterally amend or repeal parts of statutes that had been duly passed by the United States Congress. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the six-justice majority that the line-item veto gave the President power over legislation unintended by the Constitution, and was therefore an overstep in their duties.
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
O'Connor; Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
21078