Chimel v. California

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Chimel_v._California an entity of type: Thing

Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that police officers arresting a person at home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. The rule on searches incident to a lawful arrest within the home is now known as the Chimel Rule. Ronald M. George, the young Deputy Attorney General who unsuccessfully argued the State of California's position before the high court, ultimately became Chief Justice of the State of California. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Chimel v. California
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Ted Chimel v. State of California
xsd:integer 4300850
xsd:integer 1121551635
rdf:langString Rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString White
rdf:langString Black
rdf:langString Warren, Douglas, Harlan, Brennan, Marshall
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 752
xsd:integer 395
xsd:gMonthDay --03-27
xsd:integer 1969
rdf:langString Chimel v. California,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-23
xsd:integer 1969
rdf:langString Ted Chimel v. State of California
rdf:langString An arresting officer may search only the area "within the immediate control" of the person arrested, meaning the area from which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence. Any other search of the surrounding area requires a search warrant.
rdf:langString Chimel v. California
rdf:langString Stewart
rdf:langString Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752 (1969), was a 1969 United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that police officers arresting a person at home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but police may search the area within immediate reach of the person without a warrant. The rule on searches incident to a lawful arrest within the home is now known as the Chimel Rule. Ronald M. George, the young Deputy Attorney General who unsuccessfully argued the State of California's position before the high court, ultimately became Chief Justice of the State of California.
rdf:langString Harlan
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 9474

data from the linked data cloud