Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Central_Laborers'_Pension_Fund_v._Heinz an entity of type: Thing
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz, 541 U.S. 739 (2004), is a case that was argued in the Supreme Court of the United States on 19 April 2004. The question it presented was whether Section 204(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act contradicts Section 203(a)(3)(B).
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Petitioner v. Thomas E. Heinz, et al.
xsd:integer
643115
xsd:integer
994512268
rdf:langString
unanimous court
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
739
xsd:integer
541
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-19
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-07
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Central Laborers' Pension Fund, Petitioner v. Thomas E. Heinz, et al.
rdf:langString
ERISA ยง204 prohibits a plan amendment expanding the categories of postretirement employment that triggers suspension of the payment of early retirement benefits already accrued.
rdf:langString
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Central Laborers' Pension Fund v. Heinz, 541 U.S. 739 (2004), is a case that was argued in the Supreme Court of the United States on 19 April 2004. The question it presented was whether Section 204(g) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act contradicts Section 203(a)(3)(B).
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Ginsburg
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2298