Carpenter v. United States
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Carpenter_v._United_States an entity of type: Thing
卡本特訴美國案（Carpenter v. United States），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及（CSLI）的隱私問題。美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。
rdf:langString
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Carpenter v. United States
rdf:langString
卡本特訴美國案
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America
xsd:integer
54275492
xsd:integer
1122487655
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
xsd:integer
16
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Thomas, Alito
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
585
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-29
xsd:integer
2017
rdf:langString
Carpenter v. United States,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-22
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
James
rdf:langString
Susan
rdf:langString
Trevor
rdf:langString
Stephen Wm.
rdf:langString
Timothy Ivory Carpenter v. United States of America
rdf:langString
Government acquisition of cell-site records is a search under the Fourth Amendment, and, thus requires a warrant.
rdf:langString
Knight
rdf:langString
Smith
rdf:langString
Burrus
rdf:langString
Freiwald
rdf:langString
Carpenter v. United States
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
xsd:integer
79
205
rdf:langString
The Supreme Court, 2017 Term — Comment: The Carpenter Chronicle: A Near-Perfect Surveillance
rdf:langString
Katz Nipped and Katz Cradled: Carpenter and the Evolving Fourth Amendment
rdf:langString
https://object.cato.org/sites/cato.org/files/serials/files/supreme-court-review/2018/9/2018-cato-supreme-court-review-4.pdf| year=2018
rdf:langString
https://harvardlawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/205-235_Online.pdf| year=2018
xsd:integer
132
2017
rdf:langString
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 2206 (2018), is a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the privacy of historical cell site location information (CSLI). The Court held that the government violates the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution when it accesses historical CSLI records containing the physical locations of cellphones without a search warrant. Prior to Carpenter, government entities could obtain cellphone location records by claiming the information was required as part of an investigation. After Carpenter, government entities are required to obtain a search warrant to access that information. Recognizing the influence of new consumer communications devices in the 2010s, the Court expanded its conceptions of constitutional rights toward the privacy of this type of data. However, the Court emphasized that the Carpenter ruling was narrowly restricted to the precise types of information and search procedures that were relevant to Carpenter's complaint.
rdf:langString
卡本特訴美國案（Carpenter v. United States），是美國最高法院的一個里程碑式的判例，涉及（CSLI）的隱私問題。美國首席大法官約翰·羅伯茨提出的5–4判決之裁定，致法院認爲美國政府違反了美國憲法第四修正案，即因政府搜查了手機位置資訊的歷史記錄，其中也包含沒有搜查令的手機之實際位置資訊。
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
30152
