Bucklew v. Precythe
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bucklew_v._Precythe an entity of type: Thing
Bucklew v. Precythe, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the standards for challenging methods of capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that when a convict sentenced to death challenges the State's method of execution due to claims of excessive pain, the convict must show that other alternative methods of execution exist and clearly demonstrate they would cause less pain than the state-determined one. The Court's opinion emphasized the precedential force of its prior decisions in Baze v. Rees and Glossip v. Gross.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bucklew v. Precythe
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Russell Bucklew v. Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
xsd:integer
60390492
xsd:integer
1090550056
rdf:langString
Sotomayor
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:integer
17
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan
rdf:langString
Roberts, Thomas, Alito, Kavanaugh
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
587
xsd:gMonthDay
--11-06
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
Bucklew v. Precythe, 587 U.S. ___
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-01
xsd:integer
2019
rdf:langString
Russell Bucklew v. Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, et al.
rdf:langString
Baze v. Rees and Glossip v. Gross govern all Eighth Amendment challenges alleging that a method of execution inflicts unconstitutionally cruel pain. The specific as-applied challenge to the Eighth Amendment did not meet these previous tests.
rdf:langString
Bucklew v. Precythe
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Bucklew v. Precythe, 587 U.S. ___ (2019), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the standards for challenging methods of capital punishment under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. In a 5–4 decision, the Court held that when a convict sentenced to death challenges the State's method of execution due to claims of excessive pain, the convict must show that other alternative methods of execution exist and clearly demonstrate they would cause less pain than the state-determined one. The Court's opinion emphasized the precedential force of its prior decisions in Baze v. Rees and Glossip v. Gross.
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Kavanaugh
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
16081