Brown v. Louisiana
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Brown_v._Louisiana an entity of type: Thing
Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. It held that protesters have a First and Fourteenth Amendment right to engage in a peaceful sit-in at a public library. Justice Fortas wrote the plurality opinion and was joined by Justice Douglas and Justice Warren. Justices Brennan and Byron White concurred. Justices Black, Clark, Harlan and Stewart dissented.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Brown v. Louisiana
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Brown, et al. v. City of Louisiana, et al.
xsd:integer
2963714
xsd:integer
975674458
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
Clark, Harlan, Stewart
rdf:langString
Warren, Douglas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
131
xsd:integer
383
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-06
xsd:integer
1965
rdf:langString
Brown v. Louisiana,
xsd:date
2008-11-01
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-23
xsd:integer
1966
rdf:langString
Brown, et al. v. City of Louisiana, et al.
rdf:langString
States may only regulate the use of public facilities in a "reasonably nondiscriminatory manner, equally applicable to all." Maintaining separate library facilities clearly violated this principle.
rdf:langString
Brown v. Louisiana
rdf:langString
Fortas
rdf:langString
First Amendment Library entry for Brown v. Louisiana
rdf:langString
Brown v. Louisiana, 383 U.S. 131 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court case based on the First Amendment in the U.S. Constitution. It held that protesters have a First and Fourteenth Amendment right to engage in a peaceful sit-in at a public library. Justice Fortas wrote the plurality opinion and was joined by Justice Douglas and Justice Warren. Justices Brennan and Byron White concurred. Justices Black, Clark, Harlan and Stewart dissented.
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Brennan
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5282