Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bowen_v._Georgetown_University_Hospital an entity of type: Thing

Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that agencies should not be presumed to have the power to promulgate retroactive rules unless that power is expressly authorized by Congress. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a unanimous court that the Secretary of Health and Human Services had exceeded his rulemaking authority under the Medicare Act in promulgating a wage index rule in 1984 under which he would recoup Medicare reimbursements paid to hospitals, including Georgetown University Hospital, that had been disbursed since 1981 according to the pre-1984 rule. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment, writing separately that, in addition to the particular language of the Medicare Act, the Administrative Pr rdf:langString
rdf:langString Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
rdf:langString Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Georgetown University Hospital, et al.
xsd:integer 60465722
xsd:integer 1001805189
xsd:integer 87
rdf:langString unanimous
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 204
xsd:integer 488
xsd:gMonthDay --10-11
xsd:integer 1988
rdf:langString Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital,
xsd:gMonthDay --12-12
xsd:integer 1988
rdf:langString Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services v. Georgetown University Hospital, et al.
rdf:langString The cost-limit rule imposed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services is invalid because statutory grants of rulemaking authority should not be read to authorize the promulgation of retroactive rules unless expressly conveyed.
rdf:langString Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
rdf:langString Kennedy
rdf:langString Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital, 488 U.S. 204 (1988), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that agencies should not be presumed to have the power to promulgate retroactive rules unless that power is expressly authorized by Congress. Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for a unanimous court that the Secretary of Health and Human Services had exceeded his rulemaking authority under the Medicare Act in promulgating a wage index rule in 1984 under which he would recoup Medicare reimbursements paid to hospitals, including Georgetown University Hospital, that had been disbursed since 1981 according to the pre-1984 rule. Justice Antonin Scalia concurred in the judgment, writing separately that, in addition to the particular language of the Medicare Act, the Administrative Procedure Act more broadly prohibits retroactive rulemaking because it defines rules as having exclusively future effect, as opposed to adjudicative orders.
rdf:langString Scalia
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 12259

data from the linked data cloud