Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bonito_Boats,_Inc._v._Thunder_Craft_Boats,_Inc. an entity of type: Thing
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding a state anti-plug molding law preempted because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with the balance Congress had struck by federal patent law. The decision reaffirmed the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (1964), which held a state unfair competition law preempted on the same ground.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
xsd:integer
20834278
xsd:integer
1068899762
rdf:langString
unanimous
<second>
17280.0
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
141
xsd:integer
489
xsd:gMonthDay
--12-05
xsd:integer
1988
rdf:langString
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-21
xsd:integer
1989
rdf:langString
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
rdf:langString
The Florida statute is preempted by the Supremacy Clause, because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with federal patent law.
rdf:langString
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141 (1989), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding a state anti-plug molding law preempted because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with the balance Congress had struck by federal patent law. The decision reaffirmed the Supreme Court's earlier decision in Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co. (1964), which held a state unfair competition law preempted on the same ground.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
12631