Arizona v. Gant
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Arizona_v._Gant an entity of type: Thing
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Arizona v. Gant
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
State of Arizona, Petitioner v. Rodney Joseph Gant
xsd:integer
19694889
xsd:integer
1049672295
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Alito
xsd:integer
7
rdf:langString
Roberts, Kennedy; Breyer
rdf:langString
Scalia, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
332
xsd:integer
556
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-07
xsd:integer
2008
rdf:langString
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-21
xsd:integer
2009
rdf:langString
State of Arizona, Petitioner v. Rodney Joseph Gant
xsd:integer
1
2
rdf:langString
Arizona v. Gant
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Arizona v. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 (2009), was a United States Supreme Court decision holding that the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires law enforcement officers to demonstrate an actual and continuing threat to their safety posed by an arrestee, or a need to preserve evidence related to the crime of arrest from tampering by the arrestee, in order to justify a warrantless vehicular search incident to arrest conducted after the vehicle's recent occupants have been arrested and secured.
rdf:langString
Scalia
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8495