Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Zacchini_v._Scripps-Howard_Broadcasting_Co. an entity of type: Thing
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977), was an important U.S. Supreme Court case concerning rights of publicity. The Court held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments do not immunize the news media from civil liability when they broadcast a performer's entire act without his consent, and the Constitution does not prevent a state from requiring broadcasters to compensate performers. It was the first time (and so far the only time) the Supreme Court heard a case on rights of publicity.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Hugo Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company
xsd:integer
23185680
xsd:integer
1111664580
rdf:langString
Powell
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Brennan, Marshall
rdf:langString
Burger, Stewart, Blackmun, Rehnquist
rdf:langString
U.S. Const., Amends. I and XIV
<second>
259200.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
562
xsd:integer
433
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-25
xsd:integer
1977
rdf:langString
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-28
xsd:integer
1977
rdf:langString
Hugo Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Company
rdf:langString
The First and Fourteenth Amendments do not immunize the news media from civil liability when they broadcast a performer's entire act without his consent, nor does the Constitution prevent a State from requiring broadcasters to compensate performers.
rdf:langString
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (1977), was an important U.S. Supreme Court case concerning rights of publicity. The Court held that the First and Fourteenth Amendments do not immunize the news media from civil liability when they broadcast a performer's entire act without his consent, and the Constitution does not prevent a state from requiring broadcasters to compensate performers. It was the first time (and so far the only time) the Supreme Court heard a case on rights of publicity.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9661