Ye the Great
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Ye_the_Great an entity of type: Thing
Ye or Yeh the Great (simplified Chinese: 大业; traditional Chinese: 大業; pinyin: Dàyè; lit. 'Great Undertaking, Enterprise, or Cause') was a figure in Chinese mythology. In the Records of the Grand Historian, Sima Qian's account of the origin of the House of Ying made him the son of Lady Xiu and the egg of a black bird. He was said to have been the father of Fei the Great, who later became known as Boyi, by the Lady Hua. Some Chinese scholars have argued that his name was a title or epithet of Gao Yao, who served under Emperor Shun and was counted as the ancestor of some Li and Zhou families.
rdf:langString
大业，是女脩的儿子。女脩在纺织的时候，遇上一只生蛋的燕子，女脩吞下蛋后生下大业。大业娶少典的女儿女华，生了大费。大费就是伯益，是秦国、赵国、徐国、梁国的祖先。 根据女脩吞玄鸟卵而生子以及《说文解字·女部》、《路史·后记七》注引谯周《古史考》中“嬴，少皞氏之姓”的记载，认为大业的父方是少皞氏氏族。 《列女传》班昭注、王符《潜夫论》和郑玄《毛诗谱》均把伯益充当皋陶之子，此后高诱《吕氏春秋注》、陆德明《》、张守节《史记正义》、孔颖达《毛诗正义》、邢昺《论语注疏》、《新唐书》、郑樵《通志·氏族略》一直沿用了这种说法，认为大业和皋陶是同一人。但梁玉绳指出把伯益充当皋陶之子是刘向、郑玄等人的错误理解所导致的，并详细论证此说有误。李学勤也指出以伯益充当皋陶之子，完全违背了《史记·秦本纪》的记载，而《秦本纪》的记载出自秦人自己的史籍，当以此为准。
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Ye the Great
rdf:langString
大业
rdf:langString
Da Ye
rdf:langString
大業
xsd:integer
41313124
xsd:integer
1122944695
rdf:langString
Great Undertaking, Enterprise, or Cause
rdf:langString
Dàyè
rdf:langString
大业
rdf:langString
大業
rdf:langString
Ye or Yeh the Great (simplified Chinese: 大业; traditional Chinese: 大業; pinyin: Dàyè; lit. 'Great Undertaking, Enterprise, or Cause') was a figure in Chinese mythology. In the Records of the Grand Historian, Sima Qian's account of the origin of the House of Ying made him the son of Lady Xiu and the egg of a black bird. He was said to have been the father of Fei the Great, who later became known as Boyi, by the Lady Hua. Some Chinese scholars have argued that his name was a title or epithet of Gao Yao, who served under Emperor Shun and was counted as the ancestor of some Li and Zhou families.
rdf:langString
大业，是女脩的儿子。女脩在纺织的时候，遇上一只生蛋的燕子，女脩吞下蛋后生下大业。大业娶少典的女儿女华，生了大费。大费就是伯益，是秦国、赵国、徐国、梁国的祖先。 根据女脩吞玄鸟卵而生子以及《说文解字·女部》、《路史·后记七》注引谯周《古史考》中“嬴，少皞氏之姓”的记载，认为大业的父方是少皞氏氏族。 《列女传》班昭注、王符《潜夫论》和郑玄《毛诗谱》均把伯益充当皋陶之子，此后高诱《吕氏春秋注》、陆德明《》、张守节《史记正义》、孔颖达《毛诗正义》、邢昺《论语注疏》、《新唐书》、郑樵《通志·氏族略》一直沿用了这种说法，认为大业和皋陶是同一人。但梁玉绳指出把伯益充当皋陶之子是刘向、郑玄等人的错误理解所导致的，并详细论证此说有误。李学勤也指出以伯益充当皋陶之子，完全违背了《史记·秦本纪》的记载，而《秦本纪》的记载出自秦人自己的史籍，当以此为准。
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
1329