Vermont v. New Hampshire
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vermont_v._New_Hampshire an entity of type: Thing
Vermont v. New Hampshire, 289 U.S. 593 (1933), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the boundary between Vermont and New Hampshire is neither the thread of the channel of the Connecticut River nor the top of the west bank of the river, but rather the west bank of the river at the mean low-water mark.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Vermont v. New Hampshire
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
The State of Vermont v. The State of New Hampshire
xsd:integer
52757876
xsd:integer
980674957
rdf:langString
Van Devanter, McReynolds, Brandeis, Sutherland, Butler, Roberts, Cardozo
xsd:integer
53
rdf:langString
Hearing upon exceptions to report of the Special Master
xsd:integer
593
xsd:integer
289
xsd:integer
1933
rdf:langString
Vermont v. New Hampshire,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-29
xsd:integer
1933
rdf:langString
The State of Vermont v. The State of New Hampshire
rdf:langString
The boundary between Vermont and New Hampshire is neither the thread of the channel of the Connecticut River nor the top of the west bank of the river, but rather the west bank of the river at the mean low-water mark.
rdf:langString
Vermont v. New Hampshire
rdf:langString
Stone
rdf:langString
Vermont v. New Hampshire, 289 U.S. 593 (1933), was a United States Supreme Court case holding that the boundary between Vermont and New Hampshire is neither the thread of the channel of the Connecticut River nor the top of the west bank of the river, but rather the west bank of the river at the mean low-water mark.
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-20
xsd:integer
21
rdf:langString
Hughes
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4385