Vega v. Tekoh

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Vega_v._Tekoh an entity of type: Thing

Vega v. Tekoh, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that an officer's failure to read Miranda warnings to a suspect in custody does not alone provide basis for a claim of civil liability under Section 1983 of United States Code. In the case, the Court reviewed its previous holding of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) to determine whether respondent Carlos Vega violated plaintiff Terence Tekoh's constitutional rights by failing to read Tekoh his Miranda rights prior to interrogation. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the six-justice majority that Tekoh's Fifth Amendment rights were not violated, as Miranda rights are "not themselves rights protected by the Constitution." rdf:langString
rdf:langString Vega v. Tekoh
rdf:langString
rdf:langString Carlos Vega v. Terence Tekoh
xsd:integer 69790083
xsd:integer 1124539483
rdf:langString Kagan
xsd:integer 21
rdf:langString Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString Roberts, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett
xsd:integer 2022
rdf:langString ___
xsd:integer 597
xsd:gMonthDay --04-20
xsd:integer 2022
rdf:langString Vega v. Tekoh,
xsd:gMonthDay --06-23
xsd:integer 2022
rdf:langString Carlos Vega v. Terence Tekoh
rdf:langString A Miranda violation does not provide a basis for a Section 1983 claim.
rdf:langString Vega v. Tekoh
rdf:langString Alito
rdf:langString Supreme Court
rdf:langString Vega v. Tekoh, 597 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held, 6–3, that an officer's failure to read Miranda warnings to a suspect in custody does not alone provide basis for a claim of civil liability under Section 1983 of United States Code. In the case, the Court reviewed its previous holding of Miranda v. Arizona (1966) to determine whether respondent Carlos Vega violated plaintiff Terence Tekoh's constitutional rights by failing to read Tekoh his Miranda rights prior to interrogation. Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the six-justice majority that Tekoh's Fifth Amendment rights were not violated, as Miranda rights are "not themselves rights protected by the Constitution."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 7483

data from the linked data cloud