United States v. Univis Lens Co.

http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Univis_Lens_Co. an entity of type: Thing

United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 (1942), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court explaining the exhaustion doctrine and applying it to find an antitrust violation because Univis's ownership of patents did not exclude its restrictive practices from the antitrust laws. The Univis case stands for the proposition that when an article sold by a patent holder or one whom it has authorized to sell it embodies the essential features of a patented invention, the effect of the sale is to terminate any right of the patent holder under patent law to control the purchaser's further disposition or use of the article itself and of articles into which it is incorporated as a component or precursor. rdf:langString
rdf:langString United States v. Univis Lens Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString United States v. Univis Lens Co., Inc., et al.
xsd:integer 21062869
xsd:integer 1018435356
rdf:langString Roberts, Black, Reed, Frankfurter, Douglas, Murphy, Byrnes
xsd:integer 62
xsd:integer 241
xsd:integer 316
xsd:integer 1942
rdf:langString United States v. Univis Lens Co.,
xsd:gMonthDay --05-11
xsd:integer 1942
rdf:langString United States v. Univis Lens Co., Inc., et al.
rdf:langString United States v. Univis Lens Co.
rdf:langString Stone
rdf:langString United States v. Univis Lens Co., 316 U.S. 241 (1942), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court explaining the exhaustion doctrine and applying it to find an antitrust violation because Univis's ownership of patents did not exclude its restrictive practices from the antitrust laws. The Univis case stands for the proposition that when an article sold by a patent holder or one whom it has authorized to sell it embodies the essential features of a patented invention, the effect of the sale is to terminate any right of the patent holder under patent law to control the purchaser's further disposition or use of the article itself and of articles into which it is incorporated as a component or precursor.
xsd:gMonthDay --04-09
xsd:integer 10
rdf:langString Jackson
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 6923
owl:Thing
dbpedia-owl:Case
dbpedia-owl:LegalCase
dbpedia-owl:UnitOfWork
<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719>
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
yago:Abstraction100002137
yago:Case107308889
yago:Event100029378
yago:Happening107283608
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
dbpedia-owl:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Cropped_detail_of_File,Chief_Justice_Harlan_Fiske_Stone_photograph_circa_1927-1932.jpg>
<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Cross–sections_of_lenses_according_to_Univis's_U.S._Patent_No._1,845,940.jpg>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_antitrust_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_patent_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1942_in_United_States_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Quanta_Computer,_Inc._v._LG_Electronics,_Inc.>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_316>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_antitrust_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Bloomberg_BNA>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Lens_(optics)>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_antitrust_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Stone_Court>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Price_fixing>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Cross–sections_of_lenses_according_to_Univis's_U.S._Patent_No._1,845,940.jpg>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_patent_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed.>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1942_in_United_States_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Exhausted_combination_doctrine>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Exhaustion_doctrine_under_U.S._law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Post-sale_restraint>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Contributory_patent_infringement>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S.P.Q.>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/File:Cropped_detail_of_File,Chief_Justice_Harlan_Fiske_Stone_photograph_circa_1927-1932.jpg>
<https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/316/241.html>
<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/316/241/case.html>
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=4960524507715671821>
<https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/103675/united-states-v-univis-lens-co/>
<http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep316/usrep316241/usrep316241.pdf>
<http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.05c0wmx>
<http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/United_States_v._Univis_Lens_Co.>
<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7893505>
<https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4wxkz>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Wikisource-inline>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:USArticleI>
<http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:FilePath/Cross–sections_of_lenses_according_to_Univis's_U.S._Patent_No._1,845,940.jpg?width=300>
<https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/103675/united-states-v-univis-lens-co/>
<https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/316/241.html>
<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/316/241/case.html>
<http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep316/usrep316241/usrep316241.pdf>
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=4960524507715671821>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Univis_Lens_Co.?oldid=1018435356&ns=0>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Univis_Lens_Co.>

data from the linked data cloud