United States v. Stevens
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._Stevens an entity of type: Thing
United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 48, a federal statute criminalizing the commercial production, sale, or possession of depictions of cruelty to animals, was an unconstitutional abridgment of the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. After this ruling, the statute was revised by the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010 to have much more specific language indicating it was intended only to apply to "crush videos."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Stevens
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. Robert J. Stevens
xsd:integer
22500290
xsd:integer
1118035455
rdf:langString
Alito
xsd:integer
8
rdf:langString
Stevens, Scalia, Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amend. I;
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-06
xsd:integer
2009
rdf:langString
United States v. Stevens,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-20
xsd:integer
2010
rdf:langString
United States v. Robert J. Stevens
rdf:langString
Depictions of animal cruelty are not categorically unprotected by the First Amendment.
rdf:langString
United States v. Stevens
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
United States v. Stevens, 559 U.S. 460 (2010), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States, which ruled that 18 U.S.C. § 48, a federal statute criminalizing the commercial production, sale, or possession of depictions of cruelty to animals, was an unconstitutional abridgment of the First Amendment right to freedom of speech. After this ruling, the statute was revised by the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010 to have much more specific language indicating it was intended only to apply to "crush videos."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
14814