United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n
http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_v._South-Eastern_Underwriters_Ass'n an entity of type: Thing
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause, overturning Paul v. Virginia. Congress responded by enacting the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 which limited antitrust laws' applicability to the business and assured state authority would continue over insurance.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, et al.
xsd:integer
19281345
xsd:integer
1044382928
rdf:langString
Jackson
rdf:langString
Stone
rdf:langString
Frankfurter
rdf:langString
Douglas, Murphy, Rutledge
xsd:integer
64
xsd:integer
533
xsd:integer
322
xsd:gMonthDay
--01-11
xsd:integer
1944
rdf:langString
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-05
xsd:integer
1944
rdf:langString
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, et al.
rdf:langString
Congress can regulate insurance under the commerce clause.
rdf:langString
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association
rdf:langString
Black
rdf:langString
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association, 322 U.S. 533 (1944), is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Sherman Act, the federal antitrust statute, applied to insurance. To reach this decision, the Court held that insurance could be regulated by the United States Congress under the Commerce Clause, overturning Paul v. Virginia. Congress responded by enacting the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 which limited antitrust laws' applicability to the business and assured state authority would continue over insurance. In his partial dissent at 322 U.S. 588, Justice Robert H. Jackson of the Supreme Court said: 4. Any enactment by Congress either of partial or of comprehensive regulations of the insurance business would come to us with the most forceful presumption of constitutional validity. The fiction that insurance is not commerce could not be sustained against such a presumption, for resort to the facts would support the presumption in favor of the congressional action. The fiction therefore must yield to congressional action, and continues only at the sufferance of Congress.5. Congress also may, without exerting its full regulatory powers over the subject, and without challenging the basis or supplanting the details of state regulation, enact prohibitions of any acts in pursuit of the insurance business which substantially affect or unduly burden or restrain interstate commerce.
rdf:langString
Roberts and Reed
rdf:langString
Paul v. Virginia .
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3031