Tulk v Moxhay
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tulk_v_Moxhay an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Tulk v Moxhay is a landmark English land law case that decided that in certain cases a restrictive covenant can "run with the land" (i.e. a future owner will be subject to the restriction) in equity. It is the reason Leicester Square exists today.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Tulk v Moxhay
rdf:langString
Tulk v Moxhay
xsd:integer
30862477
xsd:integer
1107052011
rdf:langString
None published. Court authorised Law Report issued.
xsd:integer
41
rdf:langString
[1848] EWHC Ch J34
rdf:langString
Court of Chancery
rdf:langString
Restrictive covenant
rdf:langString
Tulk v Moxhay is a landmark English land law case that decided that in certain cases a restrictive covenant can "run with the land" (i.e. a future owner will be subject to the restriction) in equity. It is the reason Leicester Square exists today. On the face of it disavowing that covenants can "run with the land" so as to avoid the strict common law former definition of "running with the land", the case has been explained by the Supreme Court of Canada, in 1950 as "Covenants enforceable under the rule of Tulk v Moxhay, are properly conceived as running with the land in equity" which summarises how the case has been interpreted and applied in decisions across common law jurisdictions.
xsd:date
1848-12-22
rdf:langString
Prohibitory injunction granted by the Master of the Rolls
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8834