Trump v. Vance
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Trump_v._Vance an entity of type: Thing
川普诉万斯案（英語：Trump v. Vance），是美国联邦最高法院于2020年具有里程碑意义的一案，案涉及纽约县地方检察官调阅唐纳德·特朗普的税务记录作为对史多美·丹尼爾丑闻正在进行的调查的一部分，特朗普已提起诉讼以防止其被调阅。最高法院裁定，美国宪法第二条和至高條款并未明确排除或不要求提高向现任总统签发国家刑事传票的标准。法官于2020年7月发布了7–2的裁定。塞缪尔·阿利托和克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官持反对意见。
rdf:langString
Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark US Supreme Court case arising from a subpoena issued in August 2019 by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. against Mazars, then-President Donald Trump's accounting firm, for Trump's tax records and related documents, as part of his ongoing investigation into the Stormy Daniels scandal. Trump commenced legal proceedings to prevent their release.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Trump v. Vance
rdf:langString
川普訴萬斯案
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Donald J. Trump v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
xsd:integer
64504998
xsd:integer
1113750124
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Alito
xsd:integer
19
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, Kagan
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
591
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-12
xsd:integer
2020
xsd:gMonthDay
--07-09
xsd:integer
2020
rdf:langString
Donald J. Trump v. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr.
rdf:langString
Article II and the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president.
rdf:langString
Trump v. Vance
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Trump v. Vance, 591 U.S. ___ (2020), was a landmark US Supreme Court case arising from a subpoena issued in August 2019 by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. against Mazars, then-President Donald Trump's accounting firm, for Trump's tax records and related documents, as part of his ongoing investigation into the Stormy Daniels scandal. Trump commenced legal proceedings to prevent their release. The Court held that Article II and the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution do not categorically preclude or require a heightened standard for the issuance of a state criminal subpoena to a sitting president. The 7–2 decision was issued in July 2020, with Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas dissenting.
rdf:langString
川普诉万斯案（英語：Trump v. Vance），是美国联邦最高法院于2020年具有里程碑意义的一案，案涉及纽约县地方检察官调阅唐纳德·特朗普的税务记录作为对史多美·丹尼爾丑闻正在进行的调查的一部分，特朗普已提起诉讼以防止其被调阅。最高法院裁定，美国宪法第二条和至高條款并未明确排除或不要求提高向现任总统签发国家刑事传票的标准。法官于2020年7月发布了7–2的裁定。塞缪尔·阿利托和克拉伦斯·托马斯大法官持反对意见。
rdf:langString
Kavanaugh
rdf:langString
Gorsuch
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
32761