Tolofson v Jensen
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tolofson_v_Jensen an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
Tolofson v Jensen, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022 is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on conflict of laws in tort. The Court held that the primary determiner in selecting a country's law in tort should be the lex loci (the location where the tort occurred). The case was decided with Lucas (Litigation guardian of) v Gagnon.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Tolofson v Jensen
xsd:integer
7459872
xsd:integer
773024774
xsd:integer
22980
23445
rdf:langString
Gonthier, Cory, McLachlin and Iacobucci JJ.
rdf:langString
[1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022, 120 D.L.R. 289, 100 B.C.L.R. 1, 77 O.A.C. 81, [1995] 1 W.W.R. 609
rdf:langString
La Forest J.
rdf:langString
The proper law of a tort is the law of where the accident happened
rdf:langString
Tolofson v Jensen, [1994] 3 S.C.R. 1022 is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on conflict of laws in tort. The Court held that the primary determiner in selecting a country's law in tort should be the lex loci (the location where the tort occurred). The case was decided with Lucas (Litigation guardian of) v Gagnon.
rdf:langString
Tolofson v Jensen
rdf:langString
Major J.
rdf:langString
Lamer C.J.
xsd:date
1994-12-15
rdf:langString
Leroy Jensen and Roger Tolofson v. Kim Tolofson; Réjean Gagnon v. Tina Lucas and Justin Gagnon by their litigation guardian Heather Gagnon, Heather Gagnon personally, and Cyrille Lavoie
xsd:date
1994-02-21
rdf:langString
Tolofson and Gagnon appeals allowed.
xsd:integer
1992
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4296