Tibble v. Edison International
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Tibble_v._Edison_International an entity of type: Thing
Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Tibble v. Edison International
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al.
xsd:integer
48794321
xsd:integer
1096703314
xsd:integer
13
rdf:langString
unanimous
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
523
xsd:integer
575
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-24
xsd:integer
2015
rdf:langString
Tibble v. Edison International,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-18
xsd:integer
2015
rdf:langString
Glenn Tibble, et al, Petitioners v. Edison International, et al.
rdf:langString
Tibble v. Edison International
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Tibble v. Edison International, 575 U.S. 523 (2015), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that "because a fiduciary normally has a continuing duty to monitor investments and remove imprudent ones, a plaintiff may allege that a fiduciary breached a duty of prudence by failing to properly monitor investments and remove imprudent ones. Such a claim is timely as long it is filed within six years of the alleged breach of continuing duty."
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2196