Thing v. La Chusa
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Thing_v._La_Chusa an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson, and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial philosophy.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Thing v. La Chusa
xsd:integer
24697360
xsd:integer
1111670929
rdf:langString
Broussard
rdf:langString
Mosk
rdf:langString
Lucas, Panelli, Arguelles
xsd:integer
233
xsd:integer
57
257
17280.0
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-27
xsd:integer
1989
rdf:langString
Maria E. Thing v. James V. La Chusa
rdf:langString
A bystander can only recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress if they are closely related to the victim, are present and aware of the injury, and suffer emotional distress as a result.
rdf:langString
Thing v. La Chusa
rdf:langString
Eagleson
rdf:langString
Thing v. La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson, and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial philosophy.
rdf:langString
Kaufman
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4795