Sweezy v. New Hampshire
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sweezy_v._New_Hampshire an entity of type: Thing
Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that jailing an academic when he refused to answer questions about university lectures he had given was a violation of due process. On a larger scale, the decision established constitutional protections for academic freedom and reined in the investigative powers of state legislatures.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Sweezy v. New Hampshire
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Paul M. Sweezy v. State of New Hampshire by Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General
xsd:integer
57676500
xsd:integer
1117189221
rdf:langString
Remanded to the New Hampshire Supreme Court; petition for rehearing denied, .
rdf:langString
Clark
rdf:langString
Burton
<second>
172800.0
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
234
xsd:integer
354
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-05
xsd:integer
1957
rdf:langString
Sweezy v. New Hampshire,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-17
xsd:integer
1957
rdf:langString
Paul M. Sweezy v. State of New Hampshire by Louis C. Wyman, Attorney General
rdf:langString
Due to the unknown government interest into Sweezy's lectures and the lack of legislative oversight of the investigation, appellant's conviction violated his right to due process.
rdf:langString
Sweezy v. New Hampshire
rdf:langString
Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 U.S. 234 (1957), was a case before the United States Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that jailing an academic when he refused to answer questions about university lectures he had given was a violation of due process. On a larger scale, the decision established constitutional protections for academic freedom and reined in the investigative powers of state legislatures.
rdf:langString
Frankfurter
rdf:langString
Harlan
rdf:langString
Black, Douglas, Brennan
rdf:langString
Whittaker
rdf:langString
Warren
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
18399