Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Suntrust_Bank_v._Houghton_Mifflin_Co.
太阳信托银行诉霍頓米夫林哈科特案（英语：Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001)）是由美国联邦第十一巡回上诉法院对玛格丽特·米切尔小说《飄》的所有者做出的判决，撤销了禁止的《》（The Wind Done Gone）出版商发行该书的禁令。 这个案例代表了一个原则，即在美国创作和出版一本精心编写的戲仿小说算作合理使用。尽管声称米切尔作品的大部分内容在《》被使用，但上诉法院认为，对所涉权利进行全面裁决的可能结果将是合理使用。该决定遵照美国最高法院先前对的裁决。此案同样是在未经允许的情况下模仿，裁决裁定未经许可使用羅伊·奧比森的歌曲《》（Oh, Pretty Woman）中的低音线，即使作品是商业用途，也构成合理使用，并将这一原则从歌曲扩展到小说。这是第十一巡回法院具有约束力的判決先例。 出版商霍顿同意向莫爾豪斯學院捐款后，玛格丽特·米切尔故居选择放弃诉讼。
rdf:langString
Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001), was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit against the owner of Margaret Mitchell's 1936 novel Gone with the Wind, vacating an injunction prohibiting the publisher of Alice Randall's 2001 parody, The Wind Done Gone, from distributing the book. Mitchell's estate chose to drop the suit after publisher Houghton agreed to make a donation to Morehouse College.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co.
rdf:langString
太阳信托银行诉霍顿·米夫林·哈科特案
xsd:integer
18935115
xsd:integer
1088894984
rdf:langString
a unanimous court
<second>
17280.0
<second>
25920.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
US-CourtOfAppeals-11thCircuit-Seal.png
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-10
xsd:integer
2001
rdf:langString
Suntrust Bank, as Trustee of the Stephen Mitchell trusts f.b.o. Eugene Muse Mitchell and Joseph Reynolds Mitchell v. Houghton Mifflin Company
rdf:langString
Birch, Marcus, Wood
rdf:langString
Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co.
rdf:langString
Birch
rdf:langString
Google Scholar
rdf:langString
OpenJurist
rdf:langString
Suntrust Bank v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001), was a case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit against the owner of Margaret Mitchell's 1936 novel Gone with the Wind, vacating an injunction prohibiting the publisher of Alice Randall's 2001 parody, The Wind Done Gone, from distributing the book. The Court of Appeals recognized copyright in several characters from Gone with the Wind and found that The Wind Done Gone had "appropriate[d] numerous characters, settings, and plot twists". However, the court decided that this appropriation was protected under the doctrine of fair use. This case arguably stands for the principle that the creation and publication of a carefully written parody novel in the United States counts as fair use. In permitting parody without permission, the decision followed the 1994 United States Supreme Court decision in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. which ruled that 2 Live Crew's unlicensed use of the bass line from Roy Orbison's song "Oh, Pretty Woman" could constitute fair use even though the work was a commercial use, and extended that principle from songs to novels. It is binding precedent in the Eleventh Circuit. Mitchell's estate chose to drop the suit after publisher Houghton agreed to make a donation to Morehouse College.
rdf:langString
太阳信托银行诉霍頓米夫林哈科特案（英语：Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin Co., 268 F.3d 1257 (11th Cir. 2001)）是由美国联邦第十一巡回上诉法院对玛格丽特·米切尔小说《飄》的所有者做出的判决，撤销了禁止的《》（The Wind Done Gone）出版商发行该书的禁令。 这个案例代表了一个原则，即在美国创作和出版一本精心编写的戲仿小说算作合理使用。尽管声称米切尔作品的大部分内容在《》被使用，但上诉法院认为，对所涉权利进行全面裁决的可能结果将是合理使用。该决定遵照美国最高法院先前对的裁决。此案同样是在未经允许的情况下模仿，裁决裁定未经许可使用羅伊·奧比森的歌曲《》（Oh, Pretty Woman）中的低音线，即使作品是商业用途，也构成合理使用，并将这一原则从歌曲扩展到小说。这是第十一巡回法院具有约束力的判決先例。 出版商霍顿同意向莫爾豪斯學院捐款后，玛格丽特·米切尔故居选择放弃诉讼。
rdf:langString
Marcus
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4327