Steward Machine Co. v. Davis

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Steward_Machine_Co._v._Davis an entity of type: Thing

Steward Machine Company v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the unemployment compensation provisions of the Social Security Act of 1935, which established the federal taxing structure that was designed to induce states to adopt laws for funding and payment of unemployment compensation. The decision signaled the Court's acceptance of a broad interpretation of Congressional power to influence state laws. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
rdf:langString v.
rdf:langString Steward Machine Company, Petitioner
rdf:langString Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue
xsd:integer 4551702
xsd:integer 1081685566
rdf:langString Butler
rdf:langString Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts
rdf:langString U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8
xsd:integer 57
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 548
xsd:integer 301
xsd:integer 1937
rdf:langString Steward Machine Company v. Davis,
xsd:gMonthDay --05-24
xsd:integer 1937
rdf:langString v.
rdf:langString Steward Machine Company, Petitioner
rdf:langString Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue
rdf:langString The unemployment compensation sections of the Social Security Act are constitutional.
rdf:langString Steward Machine Company v. Davis
rdf:langString Cardozo
rdf:langString Steward Machine Company v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the unemployment compensation provisions of the Social Security Act of 1935, which established the federal taxing structure that was designed to induce states to adopt laws for funding and payment of unemployment compensation. The decision signaled the Court's acceptance of a broad interpretation of Congressional power to influence state laws. The primary challenges to the Act were based on the argument that it went beyond the powers granted to the federal government in the U.S. Constitution and that it involved coercion of the states that called for a surrender by the states of powers essential to their quasi-sovereign existence, in contravention of the Constitution's Tenth Amendment.
xsd:gMonthDay --04-08
xsd:integer 9
rdf:langString Sutherland
rdf:langString McReynolds
rdf:langString Van Devanter
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 19757

data from the linked data cloud