Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Steward_Machine_Co._v._Davis an entity of type: Thing
Steward Machine Company v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the unemployment compensation provisions of the Social Security Act of 1935, which established the federal taxing structure that was designed to induce states to adopt laws for funding and payment of unemployment compensation. The decision signaled the Court's acceptance of a broad interpretation of Congressional power to influence state laws.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
rdf:langString
v.
rdf:langString
Steward Machine Company, Petitioner
rdf:langString
Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue
xsd:integer
4551702
xsd:integer
1081685566
rdf:langString
Butler
rdf:langString
Hughes, Brandeis, Stone, Roberts
rdf:langString
U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 8
xsd:integer
57
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
548
xsd:integer
301
xsd:integer
1937
rdf:langString
Steward Machine Company v. Davis,
xsd:gMonthDay
--05-24
xsd:integer
1937
rdf:langString
v.
rdf:langString
Steward Machine Company, Petitioner
rdf:langString
Harwell G. Davis, Individually and as Collector of Internal Revenue
rdf:langString
The unemployment compensation sections of the Social Security Act are constitutional.
rdf:langString
Steward Machine Company v. Davis
rdf:langString
Cardozo
rdf:langString
Steward Machine Company v. Davis, 301 U.S. 548 (1937), was a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the unemployment compensation provisions of the Social Security Act of 1935, which established the federal taxing structure that was designed to induce states to adopt laws for funding and payment of unemployment compensation. The decision signaled the Court's acceptance of a broad interpretation of Congressional power to influence state laws. The primary challenges to the Act were based on the argument that it went beyond the powers granted to the federal government in the U.S. Constitution and that it involved coercion of the states that called for a surrender by the states of powers essential to their quasi-sovereign existence, in contravention of the Constitution's Tenth Amendment.
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-08
xsd:integer
9
rdf:langString
Sutherland
rdf:langString
McReynolds
rdf:langString
Van Devanter
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
19757