Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Spectrum_Sports,_Inc._v._McQuillan an entity of type: Thing

Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States rejected the assertion that attempted monopolization may be proven merely by demonstration of unfair or predatory conduct. Instead, conduct of a single firm could be held to be unlawful attempted monopolization only when it actually monopolized or dangerously threatened to do so. Thus, the Court rejected the conclusion that injury to competition could be presumed to follow from certain conduct. The causal link must be demonstrated. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
rdf:langString
rdf:langString v.
rdf:langString Shirley McQuillan, et vir, DBA Sorboturf Enterprises
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports, Inc., et al
xsd:integer 18473779
xsd:integer 994676745
<second> 25920.0
rdf:langString unanimous
<second> 172800.0
<second> 17280.0
xsd:integer 447
xsd:integer 506
xsd:gMonthDay --11-10
xsd:integer 1992
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan,
xsd:gMonthDay --01-25
xsd:integer 1993
rdf:langString v.
rdf:langString Shirley McQuillan, et vir, DBA Sorboturf Enterprises
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports, Inc., et al
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports may not be liable for attempted monopolization under ยง 2 absent proof of a dangerous probability that they would monopolize a relevant market and specific intent to monopolize.
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan
rdf:langString White
rdf:langString Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan, 506 U.S. 447 (1993), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States rejected the assertion that attempted monopolization may be proven merely by demonstration of unfair or predatory conduct. Instead, conduct of a single firm could be held to be unlawful attempted monopolization only when it actually monopolized or dangerously threatened to do so. Thus, the Court rejected the conclusion that injury to competition could be presumed to follow from certain conduct. The causal link must be demonstrated.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 18357
owl:Thing
dbpedia-owl:Case
dbpedia-owl:LegalCase
dbpedia-owl:UnitOfWork
<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q2334719>
yago:WikicatUnitedStatesSupremeCourtCases
yago:Abstraction100002137
yago:Case107308889
yago:Event100029378
yago:Happening107283608
yago:PsychologicalFeature100023100
yago:YagoPermanentlyLocatedEntity
dbpedia-owl:SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_antitrust_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1993_in_United_States_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/F.2d>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Monopolization>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_506>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/United_States_Court_of_Appeals_for_the_Ninth_Circuit>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Competition>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_antitrust_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Brooke_Group_Ltd._v._Brown_&_Williamson_Tobacco_Corp.>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/9th_Cir.>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:United_States_Supreme_Court_cases_of_the_Rehnquist_Court>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Category:1993_in_United_States_case_law>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/L._Ed._2d>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Swift_&_Co._v._United_States>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Certiorari>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sherman_Antitrust_Act>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Clayton_Act>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sherman_Act>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/U.S._LEXIS>
<https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112809/spectrum-sports-inc-v-mcquillan/>
<https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F3/23/1531/482575/>
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13927987118749445257>
<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/506/447/case.html>
<https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_10/argument/>
<https://www.oyez.org/cases/1992/91-10>
<http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep506/usrep506447/usrep506447.pdf>
<https://openjurist.org/506/us/447>
<http://rdf.freebase.com/ns/m.04d_szl>
<http://yago-knowledge.org/resource/Spectrum_Sports,_Inc._v._McQuillan>
<http://www.wikidata.org/entity/Q7575310>
<https://global.dbpedia.org/id/4vt9X>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Caselaw_source>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Cite_journal>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Infobox_SCOTUS_case>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Reflist>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Template:Ussc>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Sherman_Antitrust_Act>
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Clayton_Act>
<https://www.oyez.org/cases/1990-1999/1992/1992_91_10/argument/>
<https://www.oyez.org/cases/1992/91-10>
<https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/112809/spectrum-sports-inc-v-mcquillan/>
<https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/506/447/case.html>
<http://cdn.loc.gov/service/ll/usrep/usrep506/usrep506447/usrep506447.pdf>
<https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case%3Fcase=13927987118749445257>
<https://openjurist.org/506/us/447>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_Sports,_Inc._v._McQuillan?oldid=994676745&ns=0>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_Sports,_Inc._v._McQuillan>

data from the linked data cloud