Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Southern_Foundries_(1926)_Ltd_v_Shirlaw an entity of type: Agent
Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 is an important English contract law and company law case. In the field of contracts it is well known for MacKinnon LJ's decision in the Court of Appeal, where he put forth the "officious bystander" formulation for determining what terms should be implied into agreements by the courts. In the field of company law, it is known primarily to stand for the principle that damages may be sought for breach of contract by a director even though a contract may de facto constrain the exercise of powers to sack people found in the company's constitution.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw
rdf:langString
Southern Foundries Ltd v Shirlaw
xsd:integer
23108690
xsd:integer
1082954687
rdf:langString
[1940] AC 701
rdf:langString
House of Lords
rdf:langString
Viscount Maugham, Lord Atkin, Lord Wright, Lord Romer and Lord Porter
rdf:langString
Southern Foundries (1926) Ltd v Shirlaw [1940] AC 701 is an important English contract law and company law case. In the field of contracts it is well known for MacKinnon LJ's decision in the Court of Appeal, where he put forth the "officious bystander" formulation for determining what terms should be implied into agreements by the courts. In the field of company law, it is known primarily to stand for the principle that damages may be sought for breach of contract by a director even though a contract may de facto constrain the exercise of powers to sack people found in the company's constitution.
xsd:date
1940-04-22
rdf:langString
[1939] 2 KB 206
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
17321