Schriro v. Summerlin
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Schriro_v._Summerlin an entity of type: Thing
Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348 (2004), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a requirement that a different Supreme Court decision requiring the jury rather than the judge to find aggravating factors would not be applied retroactively.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Schriro v. Summerlin
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Dora B. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. Warren Wesley Summerlin
xsd:integer
2936945
xsd:integer
993398863
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy, Thomas
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
348
xsd:integer
542
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-19
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Schriro v. Summerlin,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-24
xsd:integer
2004
rdf:langString
Dora B. Schriro, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections v. Warren Wesley Summerlin
rdf:langString
Ring v. Arizona does not apply retroactively to cases already final on direct review.
rdf:langString
Schriro v. Summerlin
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Schriro v. Summerlin, 542 U.S. 348 (2004), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court held that a requirement that a different Supreme Court decision requiring the jury rather than the judge to find aggravating factors would not be applied retroactively.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4621