Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Rice_v._Norman_Williams_Co. an entity of type: Thing
Rice v. Norman Williams Co., 458 U.S. 654 (1982), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court involving the preemption of state law by the Sherman Act. The Supreme Court held, in a 9–0 decision, that the Sherman Act did not invalidate a California law prohibiting the importing of spirits not authorized by the brand owner.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Rice, Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of California v. Norman Williams Company, et al.; Bohemian Distributing Co. v. Norman Williams Co. et al.; Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of California v. Norman Williams Co. et al.
xsd:integer
23357679
xsd:integer
1063283736
rdf:langString
Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Blackmun, Powell, O'Connor
<second>
172800.0
<second>
259200.0
xsd:integer
654
xsd:integer
458
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-21
xsd:integer
1982
rdf:langString
Rice v. Norman Williams Co., 458 U.S. 654
xsd:gMonthDay
--07-01
xsd:integer
1982
rdf:langString
Rice, Director, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of California v. Norman Williams Company, et al.; Bohemian Distributing Co. v. Norman Williams Co. et al.; Wine & Spirits Wholesalers of California v. Norman Williams Co. et al.
rdf:langString
The Sherman Act did not invalidate a California law prohibiting the importing of spirits not authorized by the brand owner.
rdf:langString
Rice v. Norman Williams Co.
rdf:langString
Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Rice v. Norman Williams Co., 458 U.S. 654 (1982), was a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court involving the preemption of state law by the Sherman Act. The Supreme Court held, in a 9–0 decision, that the Sherman Act did not invalidate a California law prohibiting the importing of spirits not authorized by the brand owner.
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
White
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11853