Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Reeves,_Inc._v._Stake an entity of type: Thing
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that individual states, when acting as producers or suppliers rather than as market regulators, may discriminate preferentially against out-of-state residents. This "market participant" doctrine is an exception to the so-called negative commerce clause, which ordinarily deems state regulations invalid where they discriminate against interstate commerce in favor of intrastate commerce for the purpose of economic protectionism.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, et al.
xsd:integer
37446053
xsd:integer
1116547093
rdf:langString
Powell
rdf:langString
Brennan, White, Stevens
rdf:langString
Burger, Stewart, Marshall, Rehnquist
<second>
172800.0
rdf:langString
Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
xsd:integer
429
xsd:integer
447
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-16
xsd:integer
1980
rdf:langString
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-19
xsd:integer
1980
rdf:langString
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, et al.
rdf:langString
South Dakota's preferential treatment of South Dakota residents in its sale of state-produced cement is not a violation of the negative commerce clause.
rdf:langString
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake
rdf:langString
Blackmun
rdf:langString
Reeves, Inc. v. Stake, 447 U.S. 429 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that individual states, when acting as producers or suppliers rather than as market regulators, may discriminate preferentially against out-of-state residents. This "market participant" doctrine is an exception to the so-called negative commerce clause, which ordinarily deems state regulations invalid where they discriminate against interstate commerce in favor of intrastate commerce for the purpose of economic protectionism.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
4800