Red Sea Insurance Co Ltd v Bouygues SA

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Red_Sea_Insurance_Co_Ltd_v_Bouygues_SA

Red Sea Insurance Co Ltd v Bouygues SA [1995] 1 AC 190 is a judicial decision of the Privy Council relating to choice of law in tort. The case was an appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong, but as the case was decided in Hong Kong pursuant to the English Law Ordinance, section 3(1), it is also taken to be an authoritative statement of English law. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Red Sea Insurance Co Ltd v Bouygues SA
rdf:langString Red Sea Insurance v Bouygues SA
xsd:integer 53644716
xsd:integer 1053092782
rdf:langString [1995] 1 AC 190
rdf:langString Red Sea Insurance Co Ltd v Bouygues SA and 22 others
rdf:langString
rdf:langString choice of law in tort
rdf:langString flexible exception
rdf:langString Red Sea Insurance Co Ltd v Bouygues SA [1995] 1 AC 190 is a judicial decision of the Privy Council relating to choice of law in tort. The case was an appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal of Hong Kong, but as the case was decided in Hong Kong pursuant to the English Law Ordinance, section 3(1), it is also taken to be an authoritative statement of English law.
xsd:date 1994-07-18
rdf:langString [1992] HKLR 161
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 6226

data from the linked data cloud