Randall v. Sorrell
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Randall_v._Sorrell an entity of type: Thing
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a Vermont law which placed a cap on financial donations made to politicians. The court ruled that Vermont's law, the strictest in the nation, unconstitutionally hindered the citizens' First Amendment right to free speech. A key issue in the case was the 1976 case Buckley v. Valeo, which many justices felt needed to be revisited.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Randall v. Sorrell
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Neil Randall, et al. v. William H. Sorrell, et al.
xsd:integer
5718159
xsd:integer
1100036262
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Stevens
xsd:integer
4
rdf:langString
Ginsburg; Stevens
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
230
xsd:integer
548
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-28
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-26
xsd:integer
2006
rdf:langString
Neil Randall, et al. v. William H. Sorrell, et al.
rdf:langString
Vermont's campaign finance restrictions violated the First Amendment. Second Circuit reversed and remanded.
rdf:langString
Randall v. Sorrell
rdf:langString
Randall v. Sorrell, 548 U.S. 230 (2006), is a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States involving a Vermont law which placed a cap on financial donations made to politicians. The court ruled that Vermont's law, the strictest in the nation, unconstitutionally hindered the citizens' First Amendment right to free speech. A key issue in the case was the 1976 case Buckley v. Valeo, which many justices felt needed to be revisited.
rdf:langString
Thomas
rdf:langString
Kennedy
rdf:langString
Alito
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Roberts; Alito
rdf:langString
Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
5854