Radovich v. National Football League

rdf:langString Radovich v. National Football League

rdf:langString

rdf:langString William Radovich v. National Football League et al.

rdf:langString Harlan

rdf:langString Frankfurter

rdf:langString Brennan

rdf:langString Radovich v. National Football League,

rdf:langString William Radovich v. National Football League et al.

rdf:langString Antitrust exemption for professional baseball is specific to that sport and does not apply to professional football

rdf:langString Radovich v. National Football League

rdf:langString Clark

rdf:langString Radovich v. National Football League (NFL), 352 U.S. 445 (1957), is a U.S. Supreme Court decision ruling that professional football, unlike professional baseball, was subject to antitrust laws. It was the third of three such cases heard by the Court in the 1950s involving the antitrust status of professional sports. Three justices dissented, finding the majority arbitrary and inconsistent in refusing football the exemption it had upheld five years previously in Toolson v. New York Yankees (346 U.S. 356 (1952)). The majority admitted that the similarity between the two sports from a legal standpoint would probably have denied baseball the exemption as well were it sought afresh, but existing case law had tied their hands in the absence of any congressional action. While the NFL has secured some limited antitrust exemptions since through the legislative process, the lack of a blanket exemption due to this decision has had a major impact on the subsequent history of football. Unlike Major League Baseball, the NFL has faced several competing leagues since then (one of which merged with it) and seen five of its franchises move to new cities. Many of these actions have been accompanied by lawsuits brought against the NFL (often successfully) by competing leagues, public stadium-management authorities and its own owners.