R v Storrey

http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Storrey an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

R v Storrey [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the authority of police officers to make arrests. In addition to an officer's subjective belief that there are reasonable and probable grounds for arrest, the Court stipulated the grounds must be objectively justifiable. In his judgement, Cory J. followed and Liversidge v Anderson in stating: rdf:langString
rdf:langString R v Storrey
xsd:integer 2887188
xsd:integer 1084080082
rdf:langString Cory, J.
xsd:integer 19725
rdf:langString [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241
rdf:langString on appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario
rdf:langString R v Storrey [1990] 1 S.C.R. 241 is a leading decision of the Supreme Court of Canada on the authority of police officers to make arrests. In addition to an officer's subjective belief that there are reasonable and probable grounds for arrest, the Court stipulated the grounds must be objectively justifiable. In his judgement, Cory J. followed and Liversidge v Anderson in stating: ...the Criminal Code requires that an arresting officer must subjectively have reasonable and probable grounds on which to base the arrest. Those grounds must, in addition, be justifiable from an objective point of view. That is to say, a reasonable person placed in the position of the officer must be able to conclude that there were indeed reasonable and probable grounds for the arrest. On the other hand, the police need not demonstrate anything more than reasonable and probable grounds. Specifically, they are not required to establish a prima facie case for conviction before making the arrest.
rdf:langString R v Storrey
xsd:date 1990-02-15
rdf:langString Ronald Percy Storrey, Appellant v. Her Majesty The Queen, Respondent
xsd:date 1989-11-03
rdf:langString The appeal should be dismissed.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 1886

data from the linked data cloud