R v Stinchcombe
http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Stinchcombe an entity of type: Place
R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on the disclosure of evidence in a trial and is considered by most to be one of the most significant criminal law cases of the decade. The Court found that the Crown had a duty to provide the defence with all evidence that could possibly be relevant to the case, regardless of whether the Crown plans to call that evidence at trial or not, or whether it helps or hurts the Crown's case. This case put to rest the long-standing issue of whether the Crown could purposely deny the defence evidence that the Crown found would be harmful to their case.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
R v Stinchcombe
xsd:integer
3413393
xsd:integer
1057118425
rdf:langString
Sopinka J.
rdf:langString
[1991] 3 S.C.R. 326
rdf:langString
R v Stinchcombe, [1991] 3 S.C.R. 326 is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision on the disclosure of evidence in a trial and is considered by most to be one of the most significant criminal law cases of the decade. The Court found that the Crown had a duty to provide the defence with all evidence that could possibly be relevant to the case, regardless of whether the Crown plans to call that evidence at trial or not, or whether it helps or hurts the Crown's case. This case put to rest the long-standing issue of whether the Crown could purposely deny the defence evidence that the Crown found would be harmful to their case.
rdf:langString
R v Stinchcombe
xsd:date
1991-11-07
rdf:langString
William B Stinchcombe v Her Majesty The Queen
xsd:date
1991-05-02
rdf:langString
Appeal allowed, new trial ordered
xsd:integer
1991
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2903