R v Kouri

http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Kouri an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

R v Kouri 2005 SCC 81 (CanLII), was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that, along with its sister case R v Labaye, established that harm is the sole defining element of indecency in Canadian criminal law. The case involved a club in which couples engaged in group sex; the club was alleged to be a "common bawdy-house" (a house in which indecency or prostitution occurs). The acquittal was upheld by the Supreme Court. rdf:langString
rdf:langString R v Kouri
xsd:integer 3507541
xsd:integer 952179077
rdf:langString Bastarache and LeBel
rdf:langString Major, Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Abella and Charron
rdf:langString [2005] 3 S.C.R. 789, 2005 SCC 81
rdf:langString Judgment for the Crown in the Court of Appeal for Quebec.
rdf:langString McLachlin
rdf:langString Acts of group sex at a swingers' club were not indecent within the meaning of s. 197 of the Criminal Code because the acts were relatively private and did not degrade participants. Therefore, the club was not a common bawdy house within the meaning of s. 210 of the Code.
rdf:langString R v Kouri 2005 SCC 81 (CanLII), was a decision of the Supreme Court of Canada that, along with its sister case R v Labaye, established that harm is the sole defining element of indecency in Canadian criminal law. The case involved a club in which couples engaged in group sex; the club was alleged to be a "common bawdy-house" (a house in which indecency or prostitution occurs). The acquittal was upheld by the Supreme Court.
rdf:langString R v Kouri
xsd:date 2005-12-21
rdf:langString Her Majesty The Queen v James Kouri
xsd:date 2005-04-18
xsd:integer 2005
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 4956

data from the linked data cloud