R v Baker

http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_Baker an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

R v Baker [1989] 1 NZLR 738 was a decision of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand concerning the admissibility of hearsay evidence in a criminal trial. The judgment of President Sir Robin Cooke's created a common law exception to the rule against hearsay evidence in situations where the evidence is reliable and the witness unavailable. This principle was incorporated into the codification of the hearsay rule in the Evidence Act 2006. rdf:langString
rdf:langString R v Baker
rdf:langString R v Baker
xsd:integer 49003810
xsd:integer 995131891
rdf:langString [1989] 1 NZLR 738
rdf:langString Cooke P, Casey and Ellis JJ
rdf:langString R v Baker [1989] 1 NZLR 738 was a decision of the Court of Appeal of New Zealand concerning the admissibility of hearsay evidence in a criminal trial. The judgment of President Sir Robin Cooke's created a common law exception to the rule against hearsay evidence in situations where the evidence is reliable and the witness unavailable. This principle was incorporated into the codification of the hearsay rule in the Evidence Act 2006.
xsd:date 1989-04-20
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 7754

data from the linked data cloud