R v AM
http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_v_AM an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase
R v AM, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 569, 2008 SCC 19, is a constitutional decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the limits of police powers for search and seizure. The Court found that police do not have the right to perform a sniffer-dog search (to use dogs to conduct random searches) of public spaces when such search is not specifically authorized by statute. In this case, a student's section 8 rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") were violated when a police officer sniffer-dog searched his unattended backpack in the gymnasium of his school finding drugs in his possession.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
R v AM
xsd:integer
25881768
xsd:integer
1059205270
rdf:langString
Bastarache J
rdf:langString
Deschamps, Rothstein JJ
rdf:langString
Fish, Abella and Charron JJ
rdf:langString
R v Kang-Brown, [2008] 1 SCR 456
rdf:langString
LeBel J
rdf:langString
R v AM, [2008] 1 S.C.R. 569, 2008 SCC 19, is a constitutional decision by the Supreme Court of Canada on the limits of police powers for search and seizure. The Court found that police do not have the right to perform a sniffer-dog search (to use dogs to conduct random searches) of public spaces when such search is not specifically authorized by statute. In this case, a student's section 8 rights under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter") were violated when a police officer sniffer-dog searched his unattended backpack in the gymnasium of his school finding drugs in his possession.
rdf:langString
R v AM
rdf:langString
Binnie J and McLachin CJ
xsd:date
2008-04-25
rdf:langString
Her Majesty The Queen v AM
xsd:date
2007-05-22
rdf:langString
Appeal dismissed.
xsd:integer
2007
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
8618