R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor
http://dbpedia.org/resource/R_(UNISON)_v_Lord_Chancellor
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 is a UK labour law and UK constitutional law judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It held that fees for employment tribunals are unlawful because they impede access to justice, and defy the rule of law.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor
rdf:langString
R v Lord Chancellor
xsd:integer
54657636
xsd:integer
1082980481
rdf:langString
[2017] UKSC 51
rdf:langString
R v Lord Chancellor
rdf:langString
Rule of law, Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013, Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, judicial review
rdf:langString
R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51 is a UK labour law and UK constitutional law judgment of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. It held that fees for employment tribunals are unlawful because they impede access to justice, and defy the rule of law.
rdf:langString
Divisional Court of the Administrative Court [2014] EWHC 218 ; Divisional Court of the Administrative Court [2014] EWHC 4198 ; Court of Appeal of England and Wales [2015] EWCA Civ 935
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Lord Reed's opinion: Neuberger, Hale, Mance, Kerr, Wilson, Hughes
rdf:langString
Lady Hale's opinion: Neuberger, Mance, Kerr, Wilson, Reed, Hughes
xsd:date
2017-07-26
xsd:integer
7
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Lord Reed: The Employment Appeal Tribunal Fees Order 2013 which imposed fees on appeals from employment tribunals is unlawful ab initio under English and European Union law as it has the effect of preventing access to justice.
rdf:langString
Lady Hale, obiter: While discrimination under the Equality Act 2010 was not considered as the Order was unlawful ab initio, it was likely that it was not discriminatory in its application.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3360