Paris v Stepney BC
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_v_Stepney_BC an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1950] UKHL 3 was a decision of the House of Lords that significantly affected the concept of Standard of care in common law. The plaintiff Paris was employed by the then Stepney Borough Council as a general garage-hand. He had sight in only one eye, and his employer was aware of this. The council only issued eye protection goggles to its employees who were welders or tool-grinders. In the course of his usual work, Paris received an injury to his sighted eye. He sued the council for damages in the tort of negligence. On appeal it was decided that Stepney Borough Council was aware of his special circumstances and failed in their duty of care to give him protective goggles.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Paris v Stepney BC
rdf:langString
Paris v Stepney Borough Council
xsd:integer
30938791
xsd:integer
1085264146
rdf:langString
[1950] [1950] AC 367,
rdf:langString
Paris v Mayor, etc., of Metropolitan Borough Of Stepney
rdf:langString
Lords Simonds, Normand, Oaksey, Morton of Henryton and MacDermott
rdf:langString
Negligence
rdf:langString
Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1950] UKHL 3 was a decision of the House of Lords that significantly affected the concept of Standard of care in common law. The plaintiff Paris was employed by the then Stepney Borough Council as a general garage-hand. He had sight in only one eye, and his employer was aware of this. The council only issued eye protection goggles to its employees who were welders or tool-grinders. In the course of his usual work, Paris received an injury to his sighted eye. He sued the council for damages in the tort of negligence. On appeal it was decided that Stepney Borough Council was aware of his special circumstances and failed in their duty of care to give him protective goggles.
xsd:date
1950-12-13
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
2938