Paris v Stepney BC

http://dbpedia.org/resource/Paris_v_Stepney_BC an entity of type: Abstraction100002137

Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1950] UKHL 3 was a decision of the House of Lords that significantly affected the concept of Standard of care in common law. The plaintiff Paris was employed by the then Stepney Borough Council as a general garage-hand. He had sight in only one eye, and his employer was aware of this. The council only issued eye protection goggles to its employees who were welders or tool-grinders. In the course of his usual work, Paris received an injury to his sighted eye. He sued the council for damages in the tort of negligence. On appeal it was decided that Stepney Borough Council was aware of his special circumstances and failed in their duty of care to give him protective goggles. rdf:langString
rdf:langString Paris v Stepney BC
rdf:langString Paris v Stepney Borough Council
xsd:integer 30938791
xsd:integer 1085264146
rdf:langString [1950] [1950] AC 367,
rdf:langString Paris v Mayor, etc., of Metropolitan Borough Of Stepney
rdf:langString Lords Simonds, Normand, Oaksey, Morton of Henryton and MacDermott
rdf:langString Negligence
rdf:langString Paris v Stepney Borough Council [1950] UKHL 3 was a decision of the House of Lords that significantly affected the concept of Standard of care in common law. The plaintiff Paris was employed by the then Stepney Borough Council as a general garage-hand. He had sight in only one eye, and his employer was aware of this. The council only issued eye protection goggles to its employees who were welders or tool-grinders. In the course of his usual work, Paris received an injury to his sighted eye. He sued the council for damages in the tort of negligence. On appeal it was decided that Stepney Borough Council was aware of his special circumstances and failed in their duty of care to give him protective goggles.
xsd:date 1950-12-13
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 2938

data from the linked data cloud