O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
http://dbpedia.org/resource/O'Kelly_v_Trusthouse_Forte_plc an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] ICR 728 was a UK labour law case, in which a bare majority held that a requirement for a contract is "mutuality of obligation" between the parties, which was thought to mean an ongoing duty to offer and accept work. It has been consistently doubted, and its outcome reversed by legislation, and its reasoning superseded by Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher, which states that the only "mutual" obligations that are required is the consideration of work for a quid pro quo.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
rdf:langString
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc
xsd:integer
17157256
xsd:integer
974481461
rdf:langString
[1983] ICR 728
rdf:langString
Court of Appeal
rdf:langString
Employment contract, mutuality of obligation, casual worker, union discrimination
rdf:langString
O'Kelly v Trusthouse Forte plc [1983] ICR 728 was a UK labour law case, in which a bare majority held that a requirement for a contract is "mutuality of obligation" between the parties, which was thought to mean an ongoing duty to offer and accept work. It has been consistently doubted, and its outcome reversed by legislation, and its reasoning superseded by Autoclenz Ltd v Belcher, which states that the only "mutual" obligations that are required is the consideration of work for a quid pro quo.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
3611