Negligent infliction of emotional distress
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Negligent_infliction_of_emotional_distress an entity of type: Abstraction100002137
The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. The underlying concept is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to another individual. If one fails in this duty and unreasonably causes emotional distress to another person, that actor will be liable for monetary damages to the injured individual. The tort is to be contrasted with intentional infliction of emotional distress in that there is no need to prove intent to inflict distress. That is, an accidental infliction, if negligent, is sufficient to support a cause of action.
rdf:langString
과실의 정신적 가해행위(Negligent infliction of emotional distress)은 논란이 있는 법리로 미국의 많은 지역에서 적용되지 않고 있다. 이 법리에 따르면 모든이는 타인이 심리적 정신적 고통을 받지 않도록 합리적인 수준의 주의를 기울여야 할 의무가 있다. 이런 의무를 저버렸을 경우 가해자는 피해자에게 피해를 보상해야 한다.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
과실의 정신적 가해행위
rdf:langString
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
xsd:integer
1215598
xsd:integer
995234435
rdf:langString
The tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED) is a controversial cause of action, which is available in nearly all U.S. states but is severely constrained and limited in the majority of them. The underlying concept is that one has a legal duty to use reasonable care to avoid causing emotional distress to another individual. If one fails in this duty and unreasonably causes emotional distress to another person, that actor will be liable for monetary damages to the injured individual. The tort is to be contrasted with intentional infliction of emotional distress in that there is no need to prove intent to inflict distress. That is, an accidental infliction, if negligent, is sufficient to support a cause of action.
rdf:langString
과실의 정신적 가해행위(Negligent infliction of emotional distress)은 논란이 있는 법리로 미국의 많은 지역에서 적용되지 않고 있다. 이 법리에 따르면 모든이는 타인이 심리적 정신적 고통을 받지 않도록 합리적인 수준의 주의를 기울여야 할 의무가 있다. 이런 의무를 저버렸을 경우 가해자는 피해자에게 피해를 보상해야 한다.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
9441