National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan

http://dbpedia.org/resource/National_Westminster_Bank_plc_v_Morgan an entity of type: SupremeCourtOfTheUnitedStatesCase

National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan [1985] UKHL 2 is a judicial decision of the House of Lords relating to English contract law and the doctrine of undue influence. The case is most well known for the comments of Lord Scarman about the supposed requirement of "manifest disadvantage" to set aside a contract for undue influence. rdf:langString
rdf:langString National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan
rdf:langString Natwest plc v Morgan
xsd:integer 45003130
xsd:integer 1069523841
rdf:langString [1985] 1 All ER 821
rdf:langString [1985] AC 686
rdf:langString [1985] UKHL 2
rdf:langString National Westminster Bank plc v A.P. Morgan
rdf:langString Undue influence, bank
rdf:langString National Westminster Bank plc v Morgan [1985] UKHL 2 is a judicial decision of the House of Lords relating to English contract law and the doctrine of undue influence. The case is most well known for the comments of Lord Scarman about the supposed requirement of "manifest disadvantage" to set aside a contract for undue influence.
xsd:date 1985-03-07
xsd:nonNegativeInteger 7940

data from the linked data cloud