National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
http://dbpedia.org/resource/National_Endowment_for_the_Arts_v._Finley an entity of type: Thing
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act, as amended in 1990, (20 U.S.C. § 954(d)(1)), was facially valid, as it neither inherently interfered with First Amendment rights nor violated constitutional vagueness principles. The act in question required the Chairperson of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to ensure that "artistic excellence and artistic merit are the criteria by which [grant] applications are judged, taking into consideration general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the American public". Justice O'Connor delivered the opinion of the Court.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
rdf:langString
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, et al.
xsd:integer
33186472
xsd:integer
1068982146
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Rehnquist, Stevens, Kennedy, Breyer; Ginsburg
<second>
172800.0
xsd:integer
569
xsd:integer
524
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-31
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-25
xsd:integer
1998
rdf:langString
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, et al.
rdf:langString
Section 954 is facially valid, as it neither inherently interferes with First Amendment rights nor violates constitutional vagueness principles.
rdf:langString
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley
rdf:langString
O'Connor
rdf:langString
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley, 524 U.S. 569 (1998), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act, as amended in 1990, (20 U.S.C. § 954(d)(1)), was facially valid, as it neither inherently interfered with First Amendment rights nor violated constitutional vagueness principles. The act in question required the Chairperson of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) to ensure that "artistic excellence and artistic merit are the criteria by which [grant] applications are judged, taking into consideration general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the American public". Justice O'Connor delivered the opinion of the Court.
rdf:langString
Scalia
rdf:langString
Thomas
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
12062