Munaf v. Geren
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Munaf_v._Geren an entity of type: Thing
Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case where the court unanimously concluded that the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1), extends to U.S. citizens held overseas by American forces subject to an American chain of command, even if acting as part of a multinational coalition. But, it found that habeas corpus provided the petitioners with no relief, holding that "Habeas corpus does not require the United States to shelter such fugitives from the criminal justice system of the sovereign with authority to prosecute them."
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Munaf v. Geren
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
and
rdf:langString
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al. v. Sandra K. Omar and Ahmed S. Omar as next friends of Shawqi Ahmad Omar
rdf:langString
Mohammad Munaf, et al. v. Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al.
xsd:integer
16901111
xsd:integer
1025871682
rdf:langString
unanimous
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
xsd:integer
674
xsd:integer
553
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-25
xsd:integer
2008
rdf:langString
Munaf v. Geren,
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-12
xsd:integer
2008
rdf:langString
and
rdf:langString
Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al. v. Sandra K. Omar and Ahmed S. Omar as next friends of Shawqi Ahmad Omar
rdf:langString
Mohammad Munaf, et al. v. Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al.
rdf:langString
Habeas corpus statute extends to American citizens held overseas by American forces operating subject to an American chain of command, even when those forces are acting as part of a multinational coalition; however, petitioners state no claim in their habeas petitions for which relief can be granted
rdf:langString
Munaf v. Geren
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Munaf v. Geren, 553 U.S. 674 (2008), is a United States Supreme Court case where the court unanimously concluded that the habeas corpus statute, 28 U.S.C. § 2241(c)(1), extends to U.S. citizens held overseas by American forces subject to an American chain of command, even if acting as part of a multinational coalition. But, it found that habeas corpus provided the petitioners with no relief, holding that "Habeas corpus does not require the United States to shelter such fugitives from the criminal justice system of the sovereign with authority to prosecute them." The case dealt specifically with the appeals from Mohammad Munaf and Shawqi Ahmad Omar, both naturalized citizens of the United States held by MNF-I, specifically American, forces in Iraq. In its arguments, the US government relied heavily upon Hirota v. MacArthur (1948), a case in which the Supreme Court found it lacked original jurisdiction over citizens of Japan being held by the Allied Powers for the Tokyo War Crimes Tribunal because "the tribunal sentencing [the petitioners] [was] not a tribunal of the United States."
rdf:langString
Souter
rdf:langString
Ginsburg, Breyer
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
18966