Mobile v. Bolden
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Mobile_v._Bolden an entity of type: Thing
Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that disproportionate effects alone, absent purposeful discrimination, are insufficient to establish a claim of racial discrimination affecting voting. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), which challenged new city boundaries that excluded virtually all black voters from Tuskegee, Alabama, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. It did not as readily distinguish between intent and results as it would in Mobile.
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden (en français : Ville de Mobile, Alabama et autres contre Bolden et autres) est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, rendu le 22 avril 1980 (arrêt U.S. 55).
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Wiley L. Bolden, et al.
xsd:integer
4793256
xsd:integer
1120616964
rdf:langString
White
rdf:langString
Brennan
rdf:langString
Marshall
rdf:langString
U.S. Const. amends. XIV, XV; 79 Stat. 437, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1973
<second>
172800.0
<second>
17280.0
xsd:integer
55
xsd:integer
446
xsd:gMonthDay
--03-19
xsd:integer
1979
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden,
xsd:gMonthDay
--04-22
xsd:integer
1980
rdf:langString
City of Mobile, Alabama, et al. v. Wiley L. Bolden, et al.
rdf:langString
Facially neutral electoral districting is constitutional, even if the at-large elections dilute the voting strength of black citizens.
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that disproportionate effects alone, absent purposeful discrimination, are insufficient to establish a claim of racial discrimination affecting voting. In Gomillion v. Lightfoot (1960), which challenged new city boundaries that excluded virtually all black voters from Tuskegee, Alabama, the court had held that creating electoral districts which disenfranchised blacks violated the Fifteenth Amendment. It did not as readily distinguish between intent and results as it would in Mobile.
rdf:langString
Mobile v. Bolden (en français : Ville de Mobile, Alabama et autres contre Bolden et autres) est un arrêt de la Cour suprême des États-Unis, rendu le 22 avril 1980 (arrêt U.S. 55).
rdf:langString
Stevens
rdf:langString
Blackmun
rdf:langString
Burger, Powell, Rehnquist
rdf:langString
Stewart
xsd:gMonthDay
--10-29
xsd:integer
1979
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11312