Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
http://dbpedia.org/resource/Minnesota_Voters_Alliance_v._Mansky an entity of type: Thing
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court concerning the constitutionality of limits on political speech in a polling place venue. The case challenged a century-old Minnesota law that prevents voters from wearing clothing or items considered political while voting. While the Supreme Court previously affirmed that political campaigning near polling places may be restricted, the Minnesota law was challenged on being overbroad and violation of free speech rights under the First Amendment. The case's decision was issued on June 14, 2018, with the Court finding 7–2 that the Minnesota law was overbroad of what could be considered "political" speech, violating free speech rights and deemed unconstitutional.
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
rdf:langString
rdf:langString
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners v. Joe Mansky, et al.
xsd:integer
57681573
xsd:integer
1100036145
rdf:langString
Sotomayor
xsd:integer
16
rdf:langString
Breyer
rdf:langString
Kennedy, Thomas, Ginsburg, Alito, Kagan, Gorsuch
<second>
172800.0
<second>
25920.0
rdf:langString
___
xsd:integer
585
xsd:gMonthDay
--02-28
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. ___
xsd:gMonthDay
--06-14
xsd:integer
2018
rdf:langString
Minnesota Voters Alliance, et al., Petitioners v. Joe Mansky, et al.
rdf:langString
Minnesota’s ban on political apparel at polling places violates the First Amendment’s free speech clause.
rdf:langString
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky
rdf:langString
Roberts
rdf:langString
Supreme Court
rdf:langString
Minnesota Voters Alliance v. Mansky, 585 U.S. ___ (2018), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court concerning the constitutionality of limits on political speech in a polling place venue. The case challenged a century-old Minnesota law that prevents voters from wearing clothing or items considered political while voting. While the Supreme Court previously affirmed that political campaigning near polling places may be restricted, the Minnesota law was challenged on being overbroad and violation of free speech rights under the First Amendment. The case's decision was issued on June 14, 2018, with the Court finding 7–2 that the Minnesota law was overbroad of what could be considered "political" speech, violating free speech rights and deemed unconstitutional.
xsd:nonNegativeInteger
11203
